

At its most fundamental level, a teaching philosophy is a framework that says where you stand and why. It helps organize your thinking, clarify your goals, and guide your decisions. Having a teaching philosophy also imparts consistency to what you do.
Sharing your teaching philosophy is the quickest way to communicate to others your point of view and the short- and long-term goals of your teaching (parents, students, and colleagues who might refer students to you).
In your teaching philosophy also lies the key to an advertising program which will be effective at attracting your favorite kinds of students. Your teaching philosophy also can generate text for your advertisements and studio brochure.
As you formulate your teaching philosophy, you must arrive at answers to three crucial questions:
1. What are you creating? (Which product are you seeking: a pianist or a musician? a technician or an interpret?) The answer has a major impact on the content of your curriculum.
2. Which is more important: skill/content or how to learn? (Do you prefer your students play pieces or know how to learn? have a knowledge about music and ability to play the piano or certain attitudes about music, himself, and how to succeed in life?) These responses speak to your teaching style and your interaction with students.
3. Which is more important: product or process? (Which is of greater importance: the end or the means? the destination or the journey?) Your answers indicate your overall approach to private music study.
If you selected mostly the first of each of the above possibilities, your preference is for the product. Your approach will be very specific. Your curriculum will zero in quickly on skills which are unique to pianists, and the student's on-going study will emphasize masteries that apply directly to piano literature. Teachers who are product-oriented also emphasize learning repertoire. To them, traversing the literature is very important as evidence of progress. Such teachers tend to favor competitions and evaluations as concrete measures of success. In the early stages of learning, unfortunately this type of teacher may succumb to the temptation to take shortcuts such as pre-notation pieces, writing in letter names of the notes, or fingering the score extensively, so that the student can play a recognizable tune as soon as possible, as a way to please parents and as a way to indicate to colleagues that they are good teachers.
If you selected mostly second choices, you value the process more than the outcome. Your approach will be more generalized. Your curriculum will take a slower and more indirect route to applied piano technique, and you will introduce supporting topics, such as singing and composition, with greater frequency. Teachers who are process-oriented concentrate on helping the student discover personal rewards in music study, find enjoyment in music-making, to feel confident of his ability to learn, and to feel that the effort put into music study is a worthwhile endeavor. Such teachers particularly encourage creativity and independence in their students. Process-oriented teachers run the danger, however, of being disorganized and somewhat superficial in preparing their students. They can get so caught up in the "feel good" that content or rigor suffer.
After wrestling with those three questions, consider some more.
A teaching philosophy is a long time in the making. You do a lot of reading and thinking. You hear other teacher talk. You observe other teachers' behavior. Some ideas coalesce. You have flashes of insight. You discard some elements and modify others.
Take a stab at writing out your teaching philosophy. Use any format you like.
Now that you've drafted your teaching philosophy, here's mine. (If you've read much at all on this portion of my home page, nothing below will come as a great revelation to you, as this philosophy permeates the files available here.)
My teaching philosophy is part of my written studio policies. I think your philosophy should be part of your studio policies, too.
The foundations of my teaching philosophy are:
1. My primary goal is to teach students how to learn.
2. Teaching must be matched to the student's learning style, not learning matched to the teacher's teaching style. Therefore, teaching style, curriculum, and approach must be flexible, varied, and individual.
3. Empowerment is the key to motivation. Motivation is not something the teacher does to a student; it is something the student does to himself. The teacher's part is to introduce possibilities.
These maxims guide my interaction with students:
1. I'll never be angry if you ask a question.
2. I'll never be angry if you make a mistake.
3. I'll be upset only if you don't try. If you won't try, I can't teach you.
4. If you don't understand, it's my fault, not yours. It's my job to teach you in a way you understand.
5. Attempting is often more important than succeeding.
These other ideas are also paramount in my teaching:
1. Music is a joy.
2. Music lessons should be fun. They are a privilege, not a punishment or a requirement. If we're not having fun, something is wrong.
3. Piano study isn't always going to be easy, but it always should be satisfying.
4. I emphasize initiative and self-direction.
5. I encourage exploration and creativity.
6. I show the student respect and affection.
As regards advertising copy, presumably you'd prefer to teach people whose attitudes about music and the benefits of music study match yours. By using specific words and phrases in your advertising, you send subtle signals which will be picked up by like-minded readers searching for a piano teacher.
If you are a product-oriented teacher, your ads might mention "variety of repertoire" or "opportunities for performance and competition" or "well-developed technical curriculum."
If you are a process-oriented teacher, your ads might have phrases such as "life-time joy" or "learn how to learn" or "encourage students to be creative."
Buyers want to know what you can do for them and respond well to specifics. To make your advertising and brochures more effective, translate philosophical generalities into specific benefits the student would reap from studying with you. Here are a few examples of explicit benefits:
copyright 1997, Martha Beth Lewis, Ph.D.
Contact me for reprint permission.