Science Declares Our Universe IS Intelligently Designed
Ultrawords and the GID-model
For the GID-model interpretation, entities like ultralogics and the forthcoming ultrawords are "immaterial" in character. It is very important to remember that the GGU-model is just a "analogue model for behavior" in that it rationally represent behavior and properties where the actual objects used may be different from those presented. Recall that for the GGU-model, ultralogics are termed as "intrinsic ultranatural processes," or IUN-processes within a background region. They are also sometimes termed as force-like processes. Using this terminology, they are considered as producing natural-systems, and producing, staining, guiding or controlling natural-systems behavior. Their relation to intelligent design is considered as an extraneous interpretation that is ignored as is done in quantum logic. Further, for the GID-model, ultralogics have the same GGU-model "meanings" except their relation to intelligent design is not ignored and these IUN-processes are coupled with the intelligent agent characteristics that are considered a general signature for the intelligent design aspects. The term "signature" is also used to obtain certain signature consequence operators for observed behavior.
For simplicity, first consider an ordinary language L constructed from the set of our 25 language symbols. For our use, also include a spacing symbol |||. Technically, a (Markov) "word" is a finite combination of these symbols written left-to-right. (I note that the actual foundations of much mathematics are human experiences.) Thus aaabcaa is a word. There is an intuitive operation defined for "word theory" called by various names. Let's call it "juxtaposition." Usually, it is not represented by a symbol, however. Thus, aaabcaa is considered as formed by juxtaposition in various but finitely many ways. For example, juxtaposing aaab with caa, and aa with abcaa yields aaabcaa. There are words like it|||is|||cold.|||, which are used to replace "itiscold." so that one does not confuse the meaning. I introduced the notion of "meaningful" into word theory and few seem to know this. Certain combinations of such symbols will change their meaning when the spacing symbol is put in different places. Then a method is introduced that allows one to suppress the finitely many different left-to-right juxtaposing operations that yield the same combination. Also, one can replace the alphabet symbols with "images." Word theory is studied in abstract algebra and mathematical logic.
The methods introduced allow one to examine each member of a word as well as how the words are constructed by juxtaposition. Note that the left-to-right position notion is important in word theory. One can construct certain "words" that correspond to the sequential "appearance" or descriptions for a natural-system as it develops. This is done by considering a set of symbols P(n), where n varies over symbols for a finite set of natural numbers. Each P(n) is interpreted as a description or "image." These "words" correspond to objects within a basic form of human logic - propositional logic. (Propositional logic is the foundation for the construction of a computer microprocessor.) Using a simpler logic-system that is a sub-system for propositional logic, one obtains a consequence operator S defined on the simplest language P that contains these constructed words. These words have various algebraic properties and one can "count" the number of positions a word will require for its actual expression. All of this is then embedded into a nonstandard model.
Now what is discovered is that there exists an object w in *P and not in P. The ultralogic *S applies to this w. It is a "single" word hypothesis. It is not a set of words. And, at this point, all that is needed is to state that w is composed of more language symbols than any member of L.
HOWEVER, the higher intelligence can work with such a w as easily as we work with a word from L. This can be technically established. Such "easy" work is called "hyperfinite" work. Due to the method of construction, the interior construction of any such w can be analyzed. It contains the original P(n) images or descriptions in an ordered set d and these are contained in another ordered set d'. It is here where one can establish that d' contains symbols that construct words in *L, and these symbols and the words are not members of L.
When the ultralogic *S is applied to w and another higher intelligence process is applied, you get the d' as well as the images or descriptions in d and they appear in their required sequential order. Due to its general behavior, each such w is called an "ultraword." I often state that such ultrawords as w are composed of "supercompact information" and *S decompresses the w so as to obtain the specific information represented by each image. But, a universe is composed of even a, possible, potentially infinite quantity of natural-systems - not just one.
Due to the type of nonstandard model being used, one can show that if you take the ultrawords that comprise the development of each natural-system within a universe, then there is another single ultraword w' with a very special property. When *S is applied to w', each of the other ultrawords that generate each developing natural-system is produced as well as the individual natural-system developments. So, w' is called an ultimate ultraword. Then if a model requires multi-universes, you have another ultraword w'' that when *S is applied each w'', each w' is produced and then each of the ultrawords contained in each w'. I suppose that one would call w'' an ultimate^2 ultraword or something like that. I discuss in the Book how one interprets such ultimate ultrawords for the GGU-model.
So, one can think of all of these "ultrawords" as containing all the specific information that will lead to the formation and development of every natural-system within a material universe or within a collection of universes. However, one does not obtain the natural-systems and their development unless an ultralogic is applied. Thus, we have that ultrawords are associated with the GID-model notions of intelligent design by a higher intelligence and, when realized, the patterns produced by *S are designed by a higher intelligence. In the book, I show that ultrawords can be considered as pre-design via, at the least, two processes.