Science Declares Our Universe IS Intelligently Designed
Ultralogics and the GID-model
What comes next is almost entirely relative to the GID-model and how it models mental-type processes. I mention at the end of this article how one views the GID-model notions when only the GGU-model is being considered. Further, what I present next holds for inductive as well as deductive mental processes. Look at a physics science-community textbook-derivation for the highly discussed galactic redshift. You can, as I have done, specifically trace out the step-by-step logical steps used to obtain the redshift expression. You can use my derivation and trace out the logical steps as well. These steps form an explicit logic-system. This logic-system is a part of the much larger physics science-communities logic-system that may by mostly implicit in character until one explicitly argues for a prediction. Represent this physics logic-system by P.
For intuitive simplicity, consider P as presenting everything using a language L of specifically combined symbols. (The notion of what constitutes a language is extended for the GGU-model to include all digitized sensory specific information.) Now after doing all sorts of stuff, the characterizing processes displayed by P are embedded into a mathematical theory. The theory yields another object *P. The *P was originally called a "superlogic" but I changed the name to "ultralogic." But, why use the prefix "super" or "ultra"? Are "mental" processes characterized by *P really "super," "ultra," when compared to P? Why do I term the characteristics for *P as those of a higher intelligence?
In terms of higher intelligence (HI) terminology, it terms out that the HI uses the *P process on members of a language *L that is much larger than L. But, our human language is contained in *L. If you restrict all of these particular HI activities to L, then you get P. So, mentally, human beings are associated with these HI "starred" processes. But, basically, what can the HI do that human beings cannot?
Let X be a set of hypotheses that humans can use, and Y the set of all deductions that can be made by the physics science-community. Then using the same X, HI deduces the set of conclusions *Y. *Y can be the same as Y, but, although *Y contains Y, *Y is, usually, much, much larger than Y. This is the exact definition for a "stronger" process and indicates why *P represents a HI agent. It certainly takes humans a while to make such deductions as measured by "observer" time. How "fast" can HI deduce something? There is another ultralogic *S that comes from an exceptional simple form of human deduction S. But, what I state next is difficult to comprehend unless one realizes that HI can measure time in manners different from how we measure it. However, this HI form for "time" is but a mere sequence notion. It turns out that HI can take a single hypothesis w, and produce a, potentially, infinite set of deductions during a single instant (i.e. 0 length interval) of observer time.
Another aspect of the HI processes is relative to the language *L. This language contains certain objects that behavior like ordinary language symbols, words, sentences and has a grammar. But, for these objects, no human being can have any direct knowledge as to what are the words, sentences or even the symbols. The HI can use hypotheses from this unknowable portion of its language and deduce meaningful members for our language L for which humans can have direct knowledge.
There are other rather unusual differences between the HI processes and what humans can do but it requires one to have a basic knowledge of the workings of the nonstandard model. Nevertheless, these intuitive notions, in my view, certainly should indicate, on a basic level, why I call such *P and *S ultralogics. I point out that certain standard logic-systems are also termed as ultralogics. BUT, now I come to the truly sensational difference between ultralogics and human mental activity.
One can characterize human mental processes in a general manner. Then it turns out that there are other HI processes called "pure" ultralogics. This type does not carry the "star" on the symbol used to identify it. They have all of the same characteristics as listed above but with a major difference. If you restrict their behavior to the language L, you do not get all of the properties being expressed by the pure ultralogic. Indeed, some described results that one would observe would appear to be unguided and chaotic from the human viewpoint. The ultralogics that model probabilistic behavior are of this type. In this case, this shows that HI has designed each finite sequence of the specific physical events, where it is often assumed that the behavior is random, AND maintains the probabilistic behavior as well.
For the GGU-model, ultralogics are termed as intrinsic ultranatural processes, or IUN-processes. They are also sometimes termed as force-like processes. Using this terminology, they are considered as producing natural-systems, and producing, staining, guiding or controlling natural-systems behavior. Their relation to intelligent design is not considered but is considered as an extraneous interpretation that is ignored as is done in quantum logic. For the GID-model, ultralogics have the same GGU-model "meanings" except their relation to intelligent design is not ignored and these IUN-processes are coupled with the intelligent agent characteristics that are considered a general signature for the intelligent design aspects. The term "signature" is also used to obtain certain signature consequence operators for observed behavior.