
|
of Sila
by
|
Everyday on this planet, millions of adherents to the Buddhist teaching recite a list of disciplinary rules. They represent an intent to live in accordance with the Buddha's prescribed moral orientation, or pannatti-sila. For layman there are five such precepts or "steps of training" [sikkhapada]. For the ordained there are ten. Any student of Namgyal Rinpoche knows of his penchant to break down and analyze words and phrases in Pali, the ancient Northern Indian language spoken by the Buddha. Such analyses invariably shed new light. Dharma teacher, poet and editor Cecilie Kwiat has undertaken a similar analyzing exercise below, looking specifically at ten of the Buddha's moral cautions. They do not match precisely with the ten precepts, but do reveal much of what was behind them. Not suprisingly, one of the more complex examinations is the third item, the one dealing with, what else, sex. You'll find many varied interpretations of this issue in Buddhist commentaries!
Four or five times in the past months people have remarked to me that the work of sila is for beginners, those who do not have the wisdom of sunya [emptiness, non-inherent identity], which (so it is implied) makes sila obsolete. Someone who embodies the insight into this non-inherent identity can teach in ways that seem to contradict the ten marks of sila. Like I said; I hear this from more than one source. And the grain of truth contained therein seems to obscure the mountain of self-centeredness that also dwells in that belief. So, as part of my questioning my own beliefs, I spent some time meditating on sila, on what it does, is there a time when it is redundant, etc.. The summation of my study is this article, written because a friend asked me how one should understand sila.
2. Adinn'adana veramani:
3. Abrahmacariya veramani:
Looking to the Tipitaka, the Mahaniddesa particularly describes kama as subjective and objective. In the Vimanavatthu, which is a much later part of the Pali canon, the commentator Dhammapala lists six categories of kama which obstruct the development of clarity and insight. These are: The literal meaning of gamadhamma indicates a much broader discipline than is suggested by its usual translation as sexual lust. Dhamma means law, truth. Gama comes from the Vedic grama and means heap, collection, parish. There is evidence to support that this root word was transported for Greek and Latin usage. Latin has grex; a collection of houses, a hamlet. In German there is gemeinde; a habitable place. Gama would translate well as meaning small town. A gama would not have large markets or malls. In the time of the Buddha, a gama was the ideal place to go on almsround, so many references to it as a source of support for the ordained occur in texts. Although not literally so, the meaning of gamadhamma is taken as "being overly involved with the women of a village", and even "vile conduct". It is easy to understand how one who had taken the vows of homelessness might find that regular interaction with villagers could cause the desires for companionship, love and procreation to be stimulated. In more traditional terms, passion, impulse and greed - the most frequently occurring manifestations of kama - will arise when supportive circumstances coupled with lack of awareness are present. As lust is perhaps the strongest of these desires, gamadhamma (desire for village life) became identified as sexual lust. In the Anguttara-Nikaya or Gradual Sayings (1-10-V) the Buddha discourses on the unlikelihood that one with mind stirred and muddied by desire can understand "... either his own profit or that of others; impossible for him to understand both his own profit and that of others, or to realize states surpassing those of ordinary men, the excellence of truly Noble knowledge and insight."
4. Musavada veramani:
5. Pisuna vacaya veramani:
6. Pharusa vacaya veramani:
7. Samphappalapa veramani:
8. Abhijjhaya veramani:
9. Byapada veramani:
10. Micchadittihiya veramani: A teaching given by Sakyamuni Buddha to the Brahmin sage Sonadanda, which is recorded in the Digha Nikaya or Long Discourses volume in the Pali canon (The Qualities of a True Brahmin) involves a lively debate about worldly and spiritual worthiness. The wise Sonadanda, accompanied by a number of others of his caste, is visiting the Buddha when the question of how one can recognize a true Brahmin is introduced. The skill with which the Buddha and Sonadanda debate this volatile issue is admirable. At one point several of the Brahmins feel that Sonadanda has forsaken the truth and is - to use modern language - brainwashed by the Buddha. Sonadanda satisfies their fears by using his nephew as an example, as follows: "Angaka is handsome, good-looking, pleasing, of supremely fair complexion, in form and countenance like a Brahma, of no mean appearance, and there is none in this assembly his equal except the ascetic Gotama. He is a scholar ... I was his mantra teacher. He is well-born on both sides ... I know his parents. But if Angaka were to take life, take what is not given, commit adultery, tell lies and drink strong drink - what would good looks, or mantras, or birth profit him? But it us because a Brahmin is virtuous, ... wise ...: on account of these two points that he can truthfully declare: 'I am a Brahmin.'" "But, Brahmin, if one were to omit one of these two points, could one truthfully declare: 'I am a Brahmin'?" "No, Gotama. For wisdom is purified by morality, and morality is purified by wisdom: where one is, the other is, the moral man has wisdom and the wise man has morality, and the combination of morality and wisdom is called the highest thing in the world. Just as one hand washes the other, so wisdom is purified by morality and this combination is called the highest thing in the world."
|