|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
The goal of GREEN BUDGET 2007 is to inform lawmakers on opportunities to improve North Carolina's efforts to protect and conserve our natural resources, increase our sustainability, and improve public health. In particular, GREEN BUDGET 2007 addresses key components of the "Environmental Action Agenda 2007." Environmental Action Agenda 2007 is the product of a collaborative effort by eight North Carolina environmental groups to prioritize three key environmental action issues for the 2007-2008 Session of the General Assembly. The Environmental Action Agenda 2007 includes the following items:
We believe these issues are bi-partisan and have broad, state-wide appeal. In addition to these three issues, our GREEN BUDGET 2007 highlights a number of other environmental issues critical to North Carolina's future. These include: budgetary options for addressing hog lagoon reform; enforcement of environmental laws in NC; restoration of proposed cuts; and proposals for focused revenue enhancement. North Carolina has the opportunity to make sustainable choices that will protect and conserve our natural resources and our communities - the question is, will we take it? Making sustainable choices will
not only lead to the protection of our natural resources, but will
be beneficial to North Carolina's economy, both in the short- and
long-term. Protecting our environment and natural resources is
vital to the ever-growing tourism industry within North Carolina.
Tourism has grown to a $14 billion a year industry in North Carolina
by attracting 45 million visitors to enjoy pristine mountains, beautiful
beaches, and large array of open spaces and wildlife.1
The principal reason travelers give for visiting our state is our
outstanding natural resources.2 However, if development
continues unchecked, it is estimated that North Carolina will lose
a minimum of two-million acres of forests and farmlands in the next
twenty years.3 This loss of open space will seriously jeopardize
the natural resources that visitors to North Carolina have come to
love and enjoy. Failure to protect the quality of our environment
will negatively impact the growing tourism industry unless action
is taken. Investing in these resources, and the environmental programs
designed to protect them, will ensure a sound and growing economy
and healthy communities.
Energy independence is a buzz word
we hear a lot these days. From security concerns to global warming
to the economic costs of high energy prices, energy is on everyone's
mind. This year, North Carolina has the opportunity to take several
key steps that will increase our energy independence, address global
climate change, and save money. Addressing energy concerns is a win-win
for both government and tax-payers.
North Carolina currently imports 97% of our energy needs, such as coal and oil, from suppliers located out of the state and country. This drains a staggering $1.6 billon OUT of our state's economy each year. Increasing our energy efficiency and using more homegrown, renewable energy can transform our economy for the better. Keeping this money in North Carolina by supporting local energy sources would increase our economic vitality, create jobs for our workers, and keep more money in the pockets of consumers. In addition, the reduced consumption of traditional energy sources could lead to less pollution and cleaner air. Many respected economists believe that the non-traditional energy sector-, renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, or biofuels- will be an area of dynamic growth for the U.S. economy in coming decades. North Carolina can take the simple step right now of reducing the
state government's energy use to save taxpayers' money, encourage
growth, and create new jobs in North Carolina. Reducing state government
energy use will save taxpayers' money and help businesses. We recommend:
North Carolina's natural resources
and open spaces are essential for maintaining the high quality of
life that attracts residents, tourists, and businesses to North Carolina.
The very things that draw people and investments to our state are
in danger of being lost-our open spaces, wildlife habitats, and farmland.
The preservation of our mountains, beaches, and parks is contingent
on state and private land conservation efforts. The General Assembly
should continue its commitment of preserving these valuable resources
through funding of the Natural Resource Trust Funds and supporting
ongoing research and grant programs.
Over the past 16 years, these funds-the Clean Water Management Trust Fund, the Natural Heritage Trust Fund, the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund, and the Farmland Preservation Trust Fund-have provided critical protection for hundreds of thousands of acres of land and thousands of miles of waterways, protecting our state's waters, ecological diversity, and cultural heritage. These funds are imperative to preserving North Carolina's natural heritage and natural resources. We recommend:
Additionally we believe the state can
go a step further by providing incentives and tax benefits for activities
aimed at conserving our natural resources and protecting our environment.
Examples of how North Carolina is already providing incentives for environmental
stewardship include: tax credits for the purchase or lease of renewable
energy systems such as solar hot water heaters; removing tax penalties
for landowners who place their land in conservation easements; and "present
use tax valuation" of lands in conservation. The General Assembly
should continue this trend of rewarding environmentally beneficial behavior.
A number of such incentives are being considered in the General Assembly and the Green Budget encourages their passage:
In response to proposals to place up to 4 mega-landfills in North Carolina that could receive garbage from up and down the eastern seaboard, the state legislature passed a 12 month moratorium in 2006 on the siting of new landfills in North Carolina. The idea behind the moratorium was to allow the state time to craft new regulations to govern landfill operations in our state. The state worked diligently and new recommendations were recently
introduced by the Division of Waste Management. The "Solid
Waste Management Act of 2007" (SB1492/HB1233) will put these
recommendations into effect and we encourage you to support this
legislation. Passage will give the state additional tools to manage
solid waste as our state grows. Specifically, we recommend:
North Carolina has numerous environmental regulations that require the protection of our state's vital natural resources. However, these laws are not always adequately enforced. Habitual under-funding of the Department of Environmental and Natural Resource's (DENR) enforcement efforts has undermined our state's ability to safeguard the environment. DENR is critically short of inspectors and other staff needed to monitor and inspect environmental violators and polluters. Sedimentation and erosion are the primary
pollution sources impacting North Carolina waters; however the Division
of Land Resources' Erosion and Sedimentation Program currently has
only 32 available FTE (full time equivalent) positions responsible
for inspecting over 9,100 sites. Additionally, staffing problems such
as high rates of turnover and loss of positions significantly limit
the program's effectiveness. DENR is less able to respond to permit
applications, take enforcement action, inspect and monitor permitted
facilities, and respond to priority issues, thus limiting DENR's ability
to perform its mission. The result is an ongoing decline in DENR's
capacity to protect public health and ensure resources vital to our
economy. To begin addressing this shortfall, the Governor's budget
calls for adding 7 sedimentation inspector positions to the Division
of Land Resources.
We support:
"Green Fees" are fees that
reflect the true costs of the state's services by incorporating environmental
costs that are usually borne indirectly by taxpayers. Many green fees
that reflect the full cost of environmentally harmful activities have
already been adopted in North Carolina. These include an advance recycling
fee on all large appliances that is collected from the consumer at
the time of purchase. The fee is then distributed to counties to fund
recycling programs that keep these appliances out of landfills. Another
program provides for a sales tax on dry cleaning services that is
then used to clean up environmental contamination caused by toxic
dry cleaning solvents.
We ask the General Assembly to expand
the use of green fees to mitigate the damages caused by goods and
services that have negative environmental or health impacts. Creative
and successful examples of these fees can be found across the United
States. A statewide "tipping fee" at all public and private
solid waste facilities, like those levied in over a dozen states,
will generate substantial revenue that can be used to clean up abandoned
landfills and for certain recycling programs.
By imposing green fees on certain services
that are deemed environmentally harmful, the state can reduce pollution
and waste while simultaneously generating revenue to fund the permitting
programs. Increased revenues from targeted green fees will allow state
agencies to better staff and administer programs and decrease their
reliance on state appropriations.
In North Carolina, many local governments impose erosion and sedimentation control fees on developers that are significantly higher than the state fee of $50 per acre. For example, Asheville's stormwater and erosion control agency charges $540 per acre being disturbed. A portion of the fee is allocated to cover the actual cost of an inspector's time for plan review, investigation of complaints, and issuing Notices of Violation.4 Funds that are raised from the state sedimentation and erosion control fee go into a special fund that is used for plan review, travel expenses for inspection visits, and enforcement. Previous proposals to increase the state fee from $50 per acre to $100 per acre have invariably failed in the face of fierce opposition from development interests. An electronics recycling program is
another arena where green fees could be implemented. Electronics recycling
is a critical strategy to prevent toxic heavy metals from entering
the waste stream and polluting our water, recover valuable materials,
and create jobs in the recycling industry. By imposing advance recovery
fees on the sale of electronics, local governments could recover the
costs of establishing such programs and the state could retain the
necessary resources to administer the program.
We support:
The hog industry plays a significant
economic role in our state. The environmental impact is also significant
- so significant that the legislature passed a moratorium on new hog
farms ten years ago. Despite this moratorium, the number of hogs in
North Carolina has grown by an estimated 500,000 additional hogs.
While this increase was allowed under the terms of the moratorium,
it does not negate the negative impacts on water quality, nor the
degraded quality of life in many of our rural communities over the
past decade.
For the residents who live next to or near these large hog farms, the negative impacts of odor and groundwater contamination continue unabated. Ten years after the moratorium, hog waste is still stored in lagoons and sprayed onto spray fields, often resulting in direct contamination of surface and ground water. To address these concerns, new legislation has been introduced that acknowledges the important economic role of the N.C. hog industry, gives a strong push for cleaner waste management systems, and helps citizens gain access to clean drinking water. The "Swine Farm Environmental Performance Standards/Funds" (HB 1115) has a strong, bi-partisan group of sponsors and co-sponsors. We recommend:
ConclusionThe recommendations in GREEN BUDGET
2007 are only a step in moving North Carolina towards a future that
recognizes the benefits of our natural resources and the costs to
us all if they are lost. North Carolina's natural resources are a
critical component of both our heritage and our economy. As such,
it is in the state's best interest to act as a responsible steward
of the environment. The decisions made by the General Assembly this
year will have long-lasting impacts on our future. The decision to
protect our State and its citizens should be clear.
|
|||||||
|
|
|
112 South Blount Street |